战争游戏欧洲扩张吧 关注:3,110贴子:80,519
  • 17回复贴,共1

红龙资讯----步兵系统的进化

只看楼主收藏回复

With Wargame's timeframe extending from 1975-1985 to 1975-1991 in Red Dragon, infantry units won’t be able to remain the same for the whole era without evolving like their armored counterparts.
随着战争游戏:红龙所包含的时间从过去的1975-1985增加到1975-1991。步兵们所用的武器将会随着时间的变化而改变。
图1.
In AirLand Battle, the deliveries of late-era infantry weaponry, such as the Sa80 or the widespread of the FAMAS, were not taken into account for they would have prevented some mainstream infantry units to be available in all era. In Red Dragon, it won’t be the case anymore.
在W:AB中一些比较先进的武器,比如说Sa80或者被广泛使用者的FAMAS并没有被配给到所有步兵,因为这会影响到主力步兵的服役年限。在W:RD里将不会在发生这样的事情了。
Some (not all!) infantry units, usually combat troops/rifle squads will come in two variants: the “vanilla” one representing their weaponry in 1975, as per ALB’s standards, and a second variant dated ‘85 or ‘90 (depending of the nation and the real-life evolution of its weaponry) with improved weaponry.
部分步兵单位(主要是普通的主力部队),将会以两种不同的武器组合出现:一种是比较旧的武器组合(W:AB的装备),另一种就是比较先进的武器组合(85年-90年的装备),这一切由实际那个国家的步兵有没有换装而决定。
Small arms might change, especially in terms of accuracy and close-quarter efficiency, but the main boost to infantry which this infantry improvements will provide will be with their anti-tank capacity: US Riflemen switching from M72 LAW to AT4/M136 in the mid-80’s, while the Soviet troops will drop their RPG-7 to get their hands on the dreaded Vampyr at the turn of the 90’s.
小口径武器有可能会随着年代的不同而改变,这种改变将会导致武器精度和近距离战斗的效能,但是不同年代的步兵最主要的改变还是在反坦克能力上,比如说:美国的GI在75年装备里用M72 LAW但在85-90年代装备里换装AT-4, 苏联会有RPG-7换装成 Vampyr
Thus, with nations’ infantry forces evolving at different dates, this will make era-deck more versatile: a nation which might have been “underdog”, infantry-wised, in 1975, might transitionned to its modern weaponry earlier than other nations, and thus get an edge in mid-era decks.
因此,卡组将会更加的多样化
图2.
Let’s take one of the most extrem evolution, for in this case, it will bring the unit from 1975 weapons to prototype 1992 ones : W-German Fallschirmjäger.
让我们现在来看看西德Fallschirmjäger 从75年装备到92年装备(原型)的进化(图3)
(stats are not meant to be final)
(以下数据并非最终数据,只是举个例子)
图3.
W-German Fallschirmjäger(en?) will come in ‘75 flavor in most era-decks, but will be available in their 90’s flavor only in late-era ones, and to W-Germany or Coalition decks.
大部分卡组都将能够用到西德Fallschirmjäger的75年版,但92年版的将只会出现在90年代的西德或者德法同盟卡组里。
The G11 was the Wunderwaffe supposed to replace the G3 as the main Bundeswehr assault rifle, but although it proved successfull in field testing in the late 80’s, it was dropped in the early 90’s for cost reasons (there were no more ennemy) and NATO ammo standardization (it used a unique 4,73mm caseless ammunition). But had a war broke in 1990, the G11 would surely have been mass-produced and widespred …
G11原本是西德准备用来替换G3用的,G11的测试在80年代后期就已经成功,但是因为北约军队子弹通用化和成本原因,于90年代落马。但是由于游戏设定战争在90年代爆发,所以G11就被采用了。
The Panzerfaust 3 was the Panzerfaust 44’s successor. Also ready for field testing by the late 80’s, it actually entered service in the Bundeswehr in 1992.
Panzerfaust 3是用来代替Panzerfaust 44的,于80年代晚期测试成功,并在92年装列。
Most other “improved” infantry units won’t be “prototype”, but be unlocked in era decks depending of the nation and the date, as any other unit variants …
大部分步兵将不会原型单位但是会受到年代的限制。




原文连接:http://devblog.wargame-ab.com/
最后那个说苏联步兵用于替换RPG7的Vampyr到底是啥东西?实在有点不解.


本楼含有高级字体1楼2013-11-28 20:16回复
    最后那个应该说的是RPG-29 vampire。


    2楼2013-11-28 20:24
    回复
      2025-10-28 20:34:29
      广告
      不感兴趣
      开通SVIP免广告
      tmi


      3楼2013-11-28 21:19
      回复
        AT-4终於来了,爸爸终於有像样的步兵了。


        IP属地:中国香港4楼2013-11-28 22:38
        回复
          东德有MPi AK-74N吗?波兰有钽式自动步枪吗?捷克斯洛伐克有LADA吗?


          IP属地:重庆7楼2013-11-29 13:14
          回复
            要是这样的话恐怕我军后期的步兵反坦克能力会很吃瘪啊......
            40火到现在还在用,PF-89倒是可以有,但大威力的120火箭筒出世太晚......
            轻武器嘛,95式也别想了,87式步枪凑活着用吧,反正到现在这枪还有少量使用。
            另外,像87式榴弹发射器这种东西应该算什么?说轻不轻说重不重的玩意......


            IP属地:河南8楼2013-12-03 09:37
            收起回复
              但愿显卡达标


              IP属地:四川10楼2013-12-04 19:34
              回复